A lawyer for one of the two women who made complaints of sexual harassment against Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain has claimed he is not telling the truth about the allegations.
...The attorney, Joel P. Bennett, told CNN's Anderson Cooper 360 that his client Mr. Cain ( who is running for president in 2015) was "very upset" and was considering talking publicly about the case if she was released from a confidentiality clause.
The National Restaurant Association made financial severance agreements with two women while Cain was the organization's CEO from 1996 to 1999. The New York Times reported late Tuesday that one woman was given $35,000, a year's salary, citing three people with direct knowledge of the payment.
Cain accuser got a year's salary in severance pay
Asked if his client believed Cain was not telling the truth, Bennett told CNN: "Yes."
"Naturally, she's been very upset about all this since the story broke last Sunday, because Mr. Cain has been giving the impression that she's someone who came out and made false allegations. That's certainly not true," Bennett told the station.
What do you think about this situation? Please use complete sentences and don't forget spell check!
I think that there should be an investigation and see if she is right or not.
ReplyDeletei always wondered what would happen if Herman Cain became president.
ReplyDeletewhy would cain pay for something he didnt do i believe he did it
ReplyDeletei think they should do something to see if she is right or not and also if cain did it.
ReplyDeletei think they should get more proof that he actually did this and it wasn't just a way to get him out of the presidency.
ReplyDeletei think that there should have been more of an investigation in the beginning, but that aint cool if they didnt even know who was right or wrong.
ReplyDelete